KTT Matcha vs. HMX Xinhai
An in-depth look at the KTT Matcha and the HMX Xinhai switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Matcha and HMX Xinhai offer unique experiences for users. The Matcha is a tactile switch known for its comfortable, snappy tactility and clean bottom-out sound, making it a popular choice for those who enjoy a more pronounced typing feedback. On the other hand, the Xinhai is a linear switch that stands out for its softer acoustics profile and distinctively crisp, higher-pitched resonance, providing a different typing experience that may appeal to those looking for a smoother keystroke. Each switch has its own set of characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
45g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
Both the KTT Matcha and the HMX Xinhai utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the relatively stiff nature of polycarbonate, allowing for a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially beneficial for switches that use RGB lighting, as it allows the light to shine through the housing. However, despite using the same material for their top housing, the two switches may offer variations in sound due to other factors such as stem design or contact points within the switch.
Where the Matcha differs from the Xinhai is in their choice of bottom housing material. The Matcha features a polycarbonate bottom housing, which complements the top housing to create a consistent sound profile throughout the keystroke. On the other hand, the Xinhai utilizes a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound than polycarbonate, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. This difference in bottom housing material can impact the overall feel and sound of the switch when combined with the top housing material.
Overall, while the KTT Matcha and the HMX Xinhai share similarities in their use of polycarbonate for the top housing, their choice of bottom housing material sets them apart in terms of sound characteristics. The Matcha's consistent sound profile from top to bottom housing creates a unified typing experience, whereas the Xinhai's combination of polycarbonate and nylon results in a deeper and fuller sound. Both switches offer unique qualities that can appeal to different preferences in terms of sound and feel during typing.
Weight
The KTT Matcha tactile switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch both have light actuation forces and the same bottom out force of 45 grams. The Matcha has an actuation force of 40 grams, slightly heavier than the Xinhai's 37 grams. The lighter actuation force of the Xinhai may be preferred by those who type or game for extended periods, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke. On the other hand, the Matcha's slightly heavier actuation force may provide a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Both switches offer a similar bottom out force, ensuring that users will get consistent results in terms of how much force is required to press the key all the way down. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of actuation force and typing experience.
Travel distance
The KTT Matcha tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the HMX Xinhai linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. This means that the Xinhai has a shorter travel distance compared to the Matcha. The 4.0mm travel distance of the Matcha is more traditional, offering a deeper key press experience, while the 3.4mm travel distance of the Xinhai is shallower and may provide a faster response time, making it a favorite among gamers. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference, with the Matcha offering a more traditional feel and the Xinhai catering to those who prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker key presses.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.
The HMX Xinhai has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Xinhai for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the KTT Matcha and HMX Xinhai switches are described as "clacky," producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. This type of sound is crisp, bright, and percussive, adding a satisfying auditory element to your typing experience. Keep in mind that the overall sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard housing and keycaps used.
Moving on to feel, the KTT Matcha switch is characterized as "stepped," offering a tactile experience with two distinct stages during the keystroke. It is also described as "snappy," providing a super responsive typing feel. Additionally, it is mentioned as having a "feathery" quality, requiring minimal finger exertion and reducing fatigue during extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the HMX Xinhai switch is labeled as "bouncy," offering a spring-like feedback sensation and a lively key press. It is also described as "creamy," providing a smooth and buttery typing experience.
In conclusion, both the KTT Matcha tactile switch and HMX Xinhai linear switch bring unique qualities to the table in terms of sound and feel. While the Matcha offers a comfortable and snappy tactility with a clean bottom-out sound, the Xinhai showcases a softer acoustics profile with a distinct crispness in its resonance. Whether you prefer the distinctive tactility of the Matcha or the smooth, bouncy feel of the Xinhai, both switches offer a high-quality typing experience that caters to different preferences. Ultimately, your choice between the two will depend on your personal preferences for sound, feel, and overall typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the HMX Xinhai linear switch, consider your preference for typing experience. If you enjoy a more tactile feedback with a comfortable, snappy tactility and clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, buttery typing experience with a bouncy and creamy feel, the Xinhai would be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing sensation appeals to you the most, whether it's the distinct tactility of the Matcha or the smoothness of the Xinhai.
Mentioned in this article
