United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Matcha vs. PH Studio Yoel

An in-depth look at the KTT Matcha and the PH Studio Yoel switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options to compare are the KTT Matcha, a tactile switch, and the PH Studio Yoel, a linear switch. The Matcha is known for its comfortable, snappy tactility and clean bottom-out sound, making it a favorite choice for those who enjoy a satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Yoel offers a chewy typing experience and a bright, clacky sound profile, providing a different but equally enjoyable feel for typists. While the Matcha is praised for its tactile feedback, the Yoel stands out for its smooth linear action. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

40g

Actuation force

53g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

Ly

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Spring

Single stage lengthened 20mm spring

Housing materials

The KTT Matcha and PH Studio Yoel both utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which contributes to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it a perfect choice for switches intended for RGB lighting. However, the Yoel differs with its POM bottom housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound compared to the Matcha's polycarbonate bottom housing.

In terms of sound profile, the polycarbonate top housing of both the KTT Matcha and PH Studio Yoel creates a similar effect, offering a sharp and defined sound when typing. The clarity and resonance of the polycarbonate material contribute to a satisfying typing experience, particularly noticeable when pressing down on the keys. However, the difference in the bottom housing material sets the two switches apart, with the Matcha maintaining consistency with polycarbonate while the Yoel opts for POM, which results in a slightly different sound profile on the bottom-out.

While both the KTT Matcha and PH Studio Yoel share the benefits of using polycarbonate for their top housing, the decision to go with different materials for the bottom housing allows for a variation in sound between the two switches. The POM bottom housing of the Yoel contributes to a deeper and more subdued sound, providing a unique typing experience compared to the Matcha's consistent polycarbonate construction. Overall, the choice of housing material plays a significant role in shaping the sound profile and overall feel of mechanical switches, highlighting the importance of considering both top and bottom housing compositions in switch design.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the PH Studio Yoel linear switch, it is evident that the Matcha requires a lighter touch while the Yoel necessitates a slightly heavier touch. The Matcha has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, making it ideal for those who prefer a lighter typing experience. In contrast, the Yoel has an actuation force of 53 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, providing a more substantial typing feel for those who enjoy a bit more resistance. Both switches offer distinct typing experiences based on their actuation and bottom out forces, with the Matcha being on the lighter side and the Yoel being more medium in terms of force required. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing comfort and feedback.

Travel distance

In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the PH Studio Yoel linear switch, it is clear that the Matcha has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Yoel's 3.2 mm. The Matcha's 4 mm distance is more traditional and provides a deeper key press feel, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the Yoel's 3.2 mm travel distance is shorter and may appeal to gamers or those looking for a faster response time. Both switches offer different typing experiences, with the Matcha offering a longer travel distance for a more tactile feel, while the Yoel provides a shorter travel distance for quicker key presses. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and typing style.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Matcha has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Matcha for $4.88.

The PH Studio Yoel has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Yoel for $4.10.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, both the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the PH Studio Yoel linear switch are described as "clacky." This means that they both produce a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, giving a crisp and bright auditory feedback to the user. However, the Yoel switch is also noted for its high-pitched and marbly characteristics, which add to the overall resonance and satisfying sound profile when the keys reach their bottom-out point.

In terms of feel, the Matcha tactile switch is described as "snappy" and "stepped," offering a responsive typing experience with a comfortable tactility that is not overwhelming. On the other hand, the Yoel linear switch is noted for being "creamy" and "polished," providing a smooth and buttery typing experience that feels refined and sleek. Both switches offer unique feel profiles that cater to different preferences, with the Matcha offering a more responsive and tactile typing experience, while the Yoel delivers a smoother and more polished feel.

Overall, while the Matcha and Yoel switches differ in their sound and feel characteristics, they both offer a high-quality typing experience with unique attributes that cater to different preferences. Whether you prefer a snappy and tactile switch like the Matcha or a creamy and polished switch like the Yoel, both switches guarantee a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to your personal typing preferences and which qualities you prioritize in a mechanical keyboard switch.

Conclusion

To sum up, when choosing between the KTT Matcha tactile switch and the PH Studio Yoel linear switch, consider the characteristics that best suit your preferences. If you enjoy a light bottom-out force, a comfortable and snappy tactile feedback, and a clean bottom-out sound, the Matcha may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium bottom-out force, a chewy typing experience, and a bright and clacky sound profile, the Yoel switch could be more to your liking. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches boils down to your personal typing style and sound preferences. Consider what type of typing experience you value most and choose accordingly.

Mentioned in this article