Jerrzi Honey Bean vs. Bsun Hutt
An in-depth look at the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Bsun Hutt switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Bsun Hutt offer unique benefits to cater to different preferences. The Honey Bean is a linear switch known for its light and silent operation, making it perfect for environments where noise is a concern. On the other hand, the Hutt switch is a tactile option with a medium-heavy spring and a pronounced tactile bump, providing a distinct and satisfying typing experience. While the Honey Bean is easy-to-press and feathery, the Hutt is snappy and sharp. Both switches have their own set of qualities that appeal to different users' preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
40g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
49g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POK
Top housing material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
20.5mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
The Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Bsun Hutt both offer unique sound profiles based on their housing materials. The Honey Bean's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, while the Hutt's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper and crisper sound. The use of polycarbonate in the Hutt's housing leads to a more resonant sound profile, especially when paired with RGB lighting due to its translucency. On the other hand, the Honey Bean's POM bottom housing contributes to a deeper and fuller sound compared to the Hutt's nylon bottom housing, which absorbs more sound and creates a duller, rounder sound.
Despite their differences, the housing materials of the Jerrzi Honey Bean and the Bsun Hutt both play a significant role in determining the sound profile of the switches. The use of POM in the Honey Bean's housing results in a pleasing and unique sound that is on the deeper side and relatively muted, while the Hutt's polycarbonate housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound with more clarity and resonance. However, if a switch features a clear housing, it is more likely to be polycarbonate, making it especially useful for RGB lighting effects.
When considering the impact of the top and bottom housing materials on the overall sound and feel of the switches, it becomes clear that each material brings its own unique qualities to the table. The bottom housing of a switch, such as the nylon bottom housing in the Bsun Hutt, has a significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when the key is pressed down. Conversely, the top housing, like the POM top housing in the Honey Bean, influences the sound when the key is released. By understanding the properties of each housing material, users can choose a switch that best fits their preferences in terms of sound profile and typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, it is evident that the Honey Bean has a slightly higher actuation force of 42 grams compared to the Hutt's 40 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Hutt at 49 grams is higher than the Honey Bean's unknown bottom out force. This means that in terms of weight, the Hutt is slightly heavier than the Honey Bean. This makes the Hutt more suitable for individuals who prefer a stronger push feel for a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the Honey Bean may be preferred by those who like a lighter actuation force for longer typing sessions. Both switches offer different typing experiences based on their actuation and bottom out forces, catering to different preferences and needs.
Travel distance
The Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch has a travel distance of 3.7 mm, while the Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, which are popular among gamers for their quicker response times. Gamers looking for a faster and more responsive typing experience may prefer the Hutt tactile switch with its slightly shorter travel distance. However, some users may find that the longer travel distance of the Honey Bean linear switch provides a more satisfying typing experience with a deeper key press feeling. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Honey Bean has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Honey Bean for $3.59.
The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch offers a muted typing experience, which is softer and quieter compared to regular mechanical switches. This makes it ideal for environments where noise reduction is important. On the other hand, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch provides a resonant sound profile, with a higher-pitched and clean sound that enhances the typing experience with its sharp auditory feedback. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Honey Bean being more discreet and the Hutt being more immersive.
Moving on to feel, the Honey Bean linear switch is characterized by its easy-to-press and feathery feel, offering minimal resistance during key presses and reducing finger fatigue. This light actuation force provides a comfortable and effortless typing experience, suitable for long typing sessions. In contrast, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is known for its snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented feel. The pronounced feedback, firm actuation force, and distinct tactile bump of the Hutt switch create a responsive and engaging typing sensation. Both switches provide a satisfying typing experience, with the Honey Bean focusing on lightness and ease of use, while the Hutt offers a more tactile and dynamic feel.
In conclusion, the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Honey Bean provides a muted sound profile and an easy-to-press typing feel, making it ideal for quiet environments and effortless typing sessions. On the other hand, the Hutt switch delivers a resonant sound and a snappy, sharp feel with pronounced feedback, offering a more immersive typing experience. Depending on your preferences for sound and feel, both switches provide unique and enjoyable typing experiences that cater to different typing styles and needs.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when deciding between the Jerrzi Honey Bean linear switch and the Bsun Hutt tactile switch, consider your typing environment and preferences. If you value a quiet typing experience and prefer a light and linear feel, the Honey Bean switch is the ideal choice, perfect for office settings or shared spaces where noise reduction is key. On the other hand, if you enjoy a more tactile typing experience with a medium-heavy spring and prominent bump, the Hutt switch offers a satisfying and distinctive feel. Ultimately, the decision comes down to your personal preferences in terms of noise level, actuation force, and tactile feedback. Regardless of your choice, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing styles and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
