United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Bsun Hutt vs. KTT Mannan Pipefish

An in-depth look at the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Mannan Pipefish switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, two popular choices are the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Mannan Pipefish. The Bsun Hutt is a tactile switch that is characterized by its medium-heavy spring, prominent tactile bump, and balanced sound profile, providing a distinctive and enjoyable typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish is a linear switch known for its smooth linear action, lengthened spring, light 45g actuation, and bottom-out force, offering effortless and comfortable typing. While the Hutt switch is 'Snappy', 'Invigorating', 'Sharp', 'Accented', and 'Resonant', the Mannan Pipefish switch is 'Easy-to-press', 'Neutral', and 'Polished'. Depending on your preferences, you may choose the Hutt switch for a more tactile and pronounced typing experience, or the Mannan Pipefish switch for a smoother and more comfortable typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

40g

Actuation force

37g

Bottom-out force

49g

Bottom-out force

45g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POK

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

20.5mm single-staged spring

Spring

22mm spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Mannan Pipefish are quite similar in terms of their polycarbonate top housing. Both switches utilize polycarbonate in their top housing, which results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a stiff plastic that produces a clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially useful for switches that incorporate RGB lighting. Overall, the polycarbonate top housing of both switches contributes to a distinct sound experience and aesthetic appeal.

However, when it comes to the nylon bottom housing, the differences between the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Mannan Pipefish become apparent. Nylon is utilized in the bottom housing of both switches, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This is due to nylon being a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound. While both switches benefit from the acoustic properties of nylon in their bottom housing, the unique feel and sound of each switch may be attributed to how the nylon material interacts with the other components of the switch.

In conclusion, while the Bsun Hutt and the KTT Mannan Pipefish share similarities in their use of polycarbonate top housing, the differences in their nylon bottom housing may lead to variations in sound and feel. The combination of different housing materials in each switch results in a unique typing experience, with the bottom housing impacting the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound when releasing a key. Understanding how these housing materials interact with other components is essential in comparing and contrasting the overall performance of the switches.

Weight

The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a slightly higher actuation force of 40 grams compared to the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch's 37 grams. Additionally, the bottom out force of the Hutt is 49 grams, while the Mannan Pipefish has a bottom out force of 45 grams. Both switches have relatively light actuation and bottom out forces, making them suitable for users who prefer a lighter typing experience. The difference in force between the two switches is minimal, so users can expect similar results in terms of key feel. For those looking for a lighter switch to type on for extended periods of time, both the Hutt and Mannan Pipefish switches are suitable options.

Travel distance

The Bsun Hutt tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it slightly shorter than the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. Both switches fall within the range of traditional travel distances, with the Mannan Pipefish being a bit closer to the average of 4.0 mm. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Hutt for faster response times, while those who prefer a more substantial feeling when typing may gravitate towards the Mannan Pipefish. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Bsun Hutt has an MSRP of $6.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hutt for $5.39.

The KTT Mannan Pipefish has an MSRP of $3.53 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mannan Pipefish for $3.05.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch offers a resonant typing experience with a higher-pitched sound profile, providing an immersive auditory experience. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch provides a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various typing environments and preferences. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles that can be further influenced by factors such as keycaps and the keyboard itself.

When it comes to the feel of the switches, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch is described as snappy, invigorating, sharp, and accented, offering a tactile typing experience with pronounced feedback and a firm actuation force. In comparison, the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch is highlighted as easy-to-press and polished, providing a smooth and low-impact typing feel. While the Hutt switch focuses on a tactile typing experience, the Mannan Pipefish switch prioritizes effortless and comfortable typing, catering to different user preferences and typing styles.

In conclusion, the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Hutt switch provides a resonant sound profile and a tactile typing experience, while the Mannan Pipefish switch offers a neutral sound profile and smooth key presses. Ultimately, the choice between these switches would depend on the user's preference for sound, feel, and typing experience. Both switches are designed to enhance the typing journey, and users can expect a satisfying and enjoyable experience with either option.

Conclusion

In closing, when deciding between the Bsun Hutt tactile switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, consider your typing preferences and needs. If you enjoy a distinctive typing experience with a medium-heavy spring, prominent tactile bump, and balanced sound profile, the Hutt switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and effortless typing experience with a light actuation force and comfortable feel, the Mannan Pipefish switch would be more suitable. Ultimately, whether you prioritize tactile feedback and a resonant sound profile or a smooth linear action and easy-to-press keys, both switches offer unique qualities to enhance your typing journey. Choose the switch that aligns best with your typing style and preferences.

Mentioned in this article