United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Cabbage Tofu vs. Keygeek Keygeek Raw

An in-depth look at the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

The KTT Cabbage Tofu and Keygeek Keygeek Raw are both linear mechanical keyboard switches with distinct characteristics. The Cabbage Tofu switch offers improved tactility and responsiveness, thanks to its lengthened 22mm spring that enables a swift rebound after actuation for a quicker transition between keystrokes. Its sound profile is described as clacky, creamy, high-pitched, polished, silky, and snappy. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw switches stand out for their unique material blend, combining Nylon, UMPE, and Silicon for a delightfully creamy and lightweight typing experience. These switches arrive unlubricated, providing a slightly textured feel out of the box and making them ideal for enthusiasts who prefer to hand-lube their switches. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

57.5g

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

No

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon & UPE blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

UMPE & Si blend

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm spring

Spring

22mm single-stage spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches offer distinct qualities that affect the overall sound profile and typing experience. The Cabbage Tofu features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound with a clear and resonant profile. On the other hand, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw utilizes a nylon and UPE blend for its top housing, offering a unique sound profile exclusive to these switches. While both materials provide their own benefits, the polycarbonate top housing may be preferred for those looking for a crisper sound with RGB lighting capabilities, while the nylon and UPE blend may offer a deeper and fuller sound experience.

In terms of the bottom housing, the Cabbage Tofu incorporates nylon, which is known for producing a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer plastic composition. The Keygeek Keygeek Raw, on the other hand, uses a UMPE and Si blend for its bottom housing, providing a different sound profile exclusive to these switches. While both materials have their advantages, the nylon bottom housing of the Cabbage Tofu may be favored by those seeking a more rounded and dull sound experience, while the UMPE and Si blend of the Keygeek Raw offers a unique sound profile not found in other switches.

Overall, the housing materials of the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw switches play a crucial role in shaping the sound and feel of each switch. While the Cabbage Tofu features a combination of polycarbonate and nylon for its housing, providing a sharp and resonant sound, the Keygeek Keygeek Raw utilizes a blend of nylon, UPE, and Si for a distinct sound profile exclusive to these switches. However, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences, making them both excellent choices for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts looking for a customized typing experience.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, it is clear that the Cabbage Tofu is lighter in terms of actuation force at 45 grams compared to the Keygeek Raw which has an unknown actuation force. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Keygeek Raw is heavier at 57.5 grams while the Cabbage Tofu is at 53 grams. Both switches provide a medium typing experience, but the Cabbage Tofu leans towards the lighter side, while the Keygeek Raw offers a slightly heavier feel. Depending on personal preference, users may opt for the Cabbage Tofu for longer typing sessions or the Keygeek Raw for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to individual typing preferences and needs.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, it is clear that the Cabbage Tofu has a longer travel distance at 4 mm compared to the Keygeek Raw's 3.4 mm. The difference may seem minor, but it can have a notable impact on the overall feel and performance of the switch. The shorter travel distance of the Keygeek Raw may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the longer travel distance of the Cabbage Tofu may be preferred by those who enjoy a more substantial keypress. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Cabbage Tofu has an MSRP of $3.25 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Cabbage Tofu for $2.75.

The Keygeek Keygeek Raw has an MSRP of $5.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Keygeek Raw for $3.51.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Cabbage Tofu linear switch offers a clacky and high-pitched profile, producing a sharp and percussive sound when pressed. In contrast, the Keygeek Raw linear switch provides a neutral sound profile, with a moderate sound suitable for various purposes. The choice of sound ultimately depends on personal preference, as well as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

In terms of feel, the Cabbage Tofu switch is described as creamy, polished, silky, and snappy, offering a smooth, refined, and responsive typing experience. On the other hand, the Keygeek Raw switch provides a textured, mild, and subtle feel, with noticeable friction but still maintaining a gentle resistance. The Keygeek Raw switches are perfect for beginners who prefer to hand-lube their switches or enjoy a more approachable typing experience.

Considering the subjective qualities of sound and feel, the Cabbage Tofu and Keygeek Raw linear switches offer distinct experiences to users. While the Cabbage Tofu switch provides a clacky and high-pitched sound, along with a creamy and polished feel for responsive typing, the Keygeek Raw switch offers a neutral sound profile and a textured, mild feel that is suitable for a wide range of users. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preferences in sound and feel, as well as the specific typing experience desired by the user.

Conclusion

In summary, when choosing between the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Keygeek Keygeek Raw linear switch, consider the characteristics that best suit your typing preferences. If you value improved tactility, responsiveness, and a clacky, high-pitched sound profile, the Cabbage Tofu may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a creamy, polished, or silky typing experience with a neutral sound profile, the Keygeek Raw switch could be more to your liking. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing needs and preferences, whether it's for a swift rebound between keystrokes or a smooth, lightweight typing experience.

Mentioned in this article