KTT Cabbage Tofu vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2

Overview

Introducing the KTT Cabbage Tofu, a linear switch known for its improved tactility and responsiveness thanks to its lengthened 22mm spring, offering typists a swift rebound after actuation for quicker transitions between keystrokes. This switch provides a sound profile resembling Mahjong tiles colliding, with descriptors including 'clacky', 'creamy', and 'snappy'. On the other hand, we have the Jerrzi Lotus V2, a linear switch with no specific standout feature mentioned. While the Cabbage Tofu offers a unique typing experience with its tactile feedback and sound profile, the Lotus V2 may appeal to those looking for a more minimalist switch. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

KTT Cabbage Tofu Linear

Jerrzi Lotus V2 Linear

$3.25

$2.75 per 10

$4.00

$3.59 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, it is evident that they offer unique characteristics in terms of sound profile and aesthetics. The Cabbage Tofu features a polycarbonate top housing, which provides a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. In contrast, the Lotus V2 utilizes a POM top housing, resulting in a deeper and more muted sound. However, both switches offer a pleasing and unique sound experience, each with its own distinctive qualities. The translucent nature of polycarbonate in the Cabbage Tofu allows for RGB lighting effects, enhancing the visual appeal of the switch.

Furthermore, when considering the bottom housing materials of these switches, the Cabbage Tofu's nylon bottom housing offers a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. In comparison, the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing also contributes to a deeper and more muted sound experience. While the materials may differ, both switches provide a rich typing experience with their unique sound profiles. The nylon and POM bottom housings offer different levels of sound absorption, resulting in a duller and rounder sound for the Cabbage Tofu and the Lotus V2 respectively.

Overall, the housing materials of the KTT Cabbage Tofu and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 each bring their own strengths to the table. The use of polycarbonate and POM in the top housing of these switches produces distinct sound profiles, with the Cabbage Tofu offering a sharper and crisper sound compared to the deeper and more muted sound of the Lotus V2. Likewise, the nylon and POM bottom housings contribute to the overall typing experience, with both switches delivering a satisfying sound when typing. While there are differences in material composition, both switches ultimately provide a unique and pleasing typing experience for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.

Weight

The actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch are quite similar in terms of actuation force, with both switches requiring 45 grams of force to trigger a keystroke. However, when it comes to bottom out force, the Cabbage Tofu requires 53 grams, while the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unknown. The Cabbage Tofu switch can be considered slightly heavier due to the higher bottom out force compared to the Lotus V2's unknown bottom out force. In terms of weight considerations, the Cabbage Tofu may cater more to those who prefer a stronger push feel for a more substantial typing experience, while the Lotus V2 may be more suitable for those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing or gaming sessions. Ultimately, the differences in force requirements between the two switches may result in slightly varied typing experiences for users.

Travel distance

In comparing the travel distance of the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, we find that the Cabbage Tofu has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Lotus V2 has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. This indicates that the Lotus V2 has a shorter travel distance compared to the Cabbage Tofu. A shorter travel distance can be preferred by gamers for faster response times, while a longer travel distance can provide a more pronounced keystroke experience. Both switches offer a different feel and response, catering to individual preferences. So, if you prefer a quicker, more responsive key press, the Lotus V2 may be the better option, whereas if you enjoy a more substantial key press, the Cabbage Tofu with a slightly longer travel distance might be more suited to your preference.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched sound profile, reminiscent of Mahjong tiles colliding. This creates a sharp and snappy sound when pressed, which can be described as crisp, bright, and percussive. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch's sound profile is unknown, so it is difficult to make a direct comparison in this aspect. However, it is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors, such as the keyboard and keycaps being used.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch is distinguished by its creamy, polished, silky, and snappy feel. Typing on these switches provides a smooth and buttery experience, with effortless key presses and minimal resistance. The polished finish of the switch contributes to a sleek typing sensation, while the silky feel enhances overall smoothness. The snappy response of the switch makes typing feel more dynamic and alive. As for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, there is no available information on its feel, making it challenging to compare directly with the Cabbage Tofu in this regard.

In conclusion, the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch offers a unique combination of a clacky and high-pitched sound profile, along with a creamy, polished, silky, and snappy feel. This provides typists with an engaging and smooth typing experience, characterized by swift rebounds and minimal resistance. However, without information on the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch's sound and feel qualities, it is difficult to provide a direct comparison between the two switches in terms of subjective qualities. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will depend on individual preferences in sound and feel, as well as any other factors that may influence the overall typing experience.

Conclusion

Ultimately, when deciding between the KTT Cabbage Tofu linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, you should consider your typing preferences and priorities. If you value a medium-light bottom out force, improved tactility, and a swift rebound after actuation, the Cabbage Tofu may be the better choice for you. Additionally, if you enjoy a clacky and high-pitched sound profile, along with a creamy, polished, silky, and snappy typing feel, the Cabbage Tofu switch would be a great fit. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with a lower bottom out force and are willing to sacrifice certain features for that, the Lotus V2 could be the way to go. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches comes down to personal preference and what aspects of typing experience matter most to you. Consider your typing style, sound preferences, and desired key feel when making your choice.

Mentioned in this article

KTT Cabbage Tofu Linear

$3.25

$2.75 per 10

Learn more

Jerrzi Lotus V2 Linear

$4.00

$3.59 per 10

Learn more